OCD AND A Photographic Memory? Awesome!
The investigation of the murder of one Mr Ratchet. Our racist American. But wouldn’t you know it? His son’s go well past being an asshole. Far past.
Poirot goes out to meet the rescue team with the Conductor. Why? Because he needs fire to reveal the contents of the burned letter. This reveal is awesome by thecway. Visually amazing.
People complain about the perceived overuse of CGI in movies, but this one uses the right amount of CGI to bring this story to life with visual beauty. From the locations brought to life in CGI, to scenes like this.
There isn’t much to say about the investigations. You will enjoy it better if you just watched it for yourself. It’s well acted, and filmed in a visually appealing way. Nice.
Suddenly it’s clear that Mr. Ratchet’s sins go well beyond being an insufferable asshole, or stealing Ratchet’s name from Ratchet & Clank. It turns out he’s a man named Cassetti. Guilty of the one true unforgivable sin. Murder.
What started out as a kidnapping of a military man’s young son, snowballed into a string of tragic deaths. After receiving the random he murdered the not be kidnapped.
Need of the murder cause his mother, pregnant with child, to go into premature labor. Both died. The prosecutor of the area tried to frame a fresh maid for the crime. She commuted suicide. He lost his job and fell into debt when the true murderer was revealed.
Revealed, but long since gone. Fled from justice. The murders seemingly ended when a distraught Armstrong killed himself. Until the son of the ruined ex-prosecutor became Ratchet’s accountant & lawyer…
He stole from Ratchet. And no doubt was the inside man that kept the entire League Of Revengers notified as to what Ratchet was up to. Using the Orient Express as the best chance to kill him.
This has yet to be revealed, but having known the ending for awhile makes it all just call into place. As it turns out more and more the people of this train all seem to have links to Ratchet.
Well… Except the dog, the random train staff and crew, and Poirot. But he knows everything about the case because, well, as a great detective he keeps track of all crime. Like Holmes. So yeah.
Everyone is questioned, and slowly but surely it become a a game of 7 Degrees Of Mr. Ratchet. As soon it’s a matter of who doesn’t seem to have some connection to Ratchet or want him dead.
Remember earlier in the movie when Michelle Pfeiffer said someone broke into her room? That was… One of the killers. Dressed in a red kimono hiding the staff uniform he stole. A uniform along with… One of the master keys to the doors.
So yeah. Poirot’s sighting of the night time streaker was supposedly the killer. Or ONE of them at any rate. They find the kimono in Poirot’s luggage. Hidden supposedly to mock Poirot.
The staff jacket and keys? Found in the governess’ bags. Key left with the jacket, no longer of use now that Ratchet was killed. In the jacket they find traces of alcohol. Leading to Ratchet’s assistant.
We have a bit of a chase as he tries to destroy Ratchet’s ledgers and avoid Poirot. Ultimately getting body slammed through the decaying bridge scaffolding the train is perched on precariously, sent to the ground a few feet down. Captured.
In custody he proclaims his innocence, but confessed to stealing from Ratchet. As well as his relation to the former prosecutor of the Armstrong murder case. But he’s not alone.
Sure enough the doctor is touching for his innocence. But as he does maybe it’s dawning on Poirot that this murder is more complicated than it seems.
As if to verify that there is more than one murderer? Someone stabs Michelle Pfeiffer off camera with the knife used to stab Ratchet. And since she was grasping at it after it stabbed her? It explains her finger prints on the murder weapon.
How can you tell she touched it though? Didn’t that knife get passed amongst a lot of people? Isn’t it too loaded with fingerprints to sort out with 30s era police fingerprinting science?
Also if the assistant was the streaker who supposedly killed Ratchet? Then who was holding onto the murder weapon of not him? Again, it should be clear that this murder is multiple choice.
As the case moved on it may finally came in Poirot that this won’t be an easy solve. As a lot of people had motives to kill, the reasons for each slowly being dragged into the light.
So hey. I think you’ll enjoy this movie in your collection. Heck. If you are a perfectionist you might also seek out the Albert Finney & Alfred Molina versions as well. Any Case Closed fan should have room in their crime solving hearts for Agatha Christie. Surely!
Anyway the movie continues tomorrow. See you.